This session examines different ways of listening, and methodological approaches to oral history that account for the deeply contextual, personal and political natures of our projects, particularly about activism and liberatory practices. Each paper challenges us to think about how we can use oral history in creative ways to do justice to the communities with whom we work, and to imagine new ways of being in relationships with, and accountable to, each other.
“It was Amazing How Much the Disorganization was Organized”: The 2012 Quebec Student Strike and Listening for Diversity
Anna Sheftel, Concordia University
This paper explores an oral history project about the 10th anniversary of the 2012 Quebec student strike, the largest and longest student strike in Quebec history. It discusses how oral history has been a key way of capturing the diversity and decentralized nature of the movement, something lacking in a lot of scholarship and public discourse around it.
Challenges with Archiving Trans Stories: Making Peace with the Right to be Forgotten
Karl Ponthieux Stern, Concordia University
This talk draws on research led with trans and intersex activists in France, and on an articulation of literature dedicated to archival challenges with reflections from Trans Studies, to argue for our participants´ right to be forgotten. It asks what we can do as oral historians to mitigate the historical loss.
Oral History Interviews as Potential Tools for Self-Actualisation and Collective Liberation
Gracia Dyer Jalea, Concordia University
By responding to the current day needs and interests of descendants, oral history interviews are resurrected from archives to become useful tools for self-actualization. Moving beyond mere remembrance into spaces for cocreated futures, this study explores how oral histories can be used to breaking cycles and heal division so we can learn, expand and identify new pathways forward.
Utopian Dreams: From Oral History to Speculative Narrative in Activist Nonprofits
Richenda Grazette, Concordia University
This paper explores the challenges of doing oral history of activist non-profits. It proposes a research methodology in oral history that combines lived experience with dreams, in order to imagine new potentialities. When we connect oral history to dreams in this way, we are able to tap into a “third” or in between place that opens us up to potentially making transformative changes in our relationships and collective organizing practices: an anchored form of imagination, with clear steps and learnings to grow from.ABSTRACT: This session examines creative, contextual and accountable ways of doing oral history, with a particular focus on oral history as an activist or liberatory practice. Anna Sheftel discusses the challenges of doing oral histories with student activists in Quebec for the necessity of representing the broad range of experiences, identities, and perspectives that do justice to the movement. Karl Ponthieux asks how oral histories of trans activists can compel us to make peace with the right of narrators to be forgotten, especially through refusing to have their interviews archived, and how this may transform our role as oral historians. Gracia Dyer Jalea asks how engaging with family oral history interviews can transform us, our loved ones, and our communities, especially through intergenerational engagement and co-creation. Finally, Richenda Grazette examines what it means to chronicle the experiences of people working in activist non-profits, and how to reconcile their often conflictual roles in those spaces. She draws on dreams as a potential complement to oral history that allows us not only to document, but also to imagine where these stories can take us. All together, the goal of this session is to think creatively about how we engage with the deeply contextual nature of our projects, how we remain accountable to the communities with whom we work and to the people to whom we listen, and what new strategies we can imagine as oral historians.Paper Abstracts: “It was amazing how much the disorganization was organized”: The 2012 Quebec Student Strike and Listening for DiversityIn 2012, Quebec students went on strike in opposition to draconian tuition fee hikes proposed by the provincial government. This turned into the largest and longest student strike in Quebec history, as well as a broader social movement which galvanized Quebeckers against the neoliberal politics of the era. Considerable political and sociological scholarship has been published about the strike, its tactics, politics, and legacies, but what has been under-explored is the tremendous diversity and decentralization of the moment, which allowed it to include so many different groups of people and communities, produce incredibly creative actions, and transform those who participated. This paper examines an oral history project that I conducted on the tenth anniversary of the strike, and it explores the challenges of representing a movement which was defined by its decentralization and opposition to hierarchy and leadership. Memories and experiences of the strike paint a more complex picture than the existing literature often portrays, due to the positionality of the participating activists, including factors such as: language, class, immigration status, political ideology, and race. I argue that the diverse and decentralized nature of the movement is key to its historicization, and that oral history proves to be an important way of being able to capture and represent this. In this way, methodology and outcome became inextricably intertwined in this project, as oral history interviews have become central to undoing top-down and overly reductionist conceptions of what the strike was, inviting more memories and activists and approaches into the discourse.Challenges with Archiving Trans Stories: Making Peace with the Right to be ForgottenThis talk draws upon my research on the Oral History of the ExisTransInter, a yearly demonstration led by trans and intersex activists in France since 1997. As I constructed my ethics framework to research this topic, I came across significant literature pointing out the failures of institutional archives to take care of marginalized lives, and the necessity to create community-oriented archives (Chenier 2009, 2015; Lair 2020). I became certain that archiving my own interviews with trans and intersex activists would be an absolute necessity and could only be achieved by offering the option of community-oriented projects. Most of my participants (7 out of 8) refused to archive their interviews, and most of them were even more worried by the premise that community-oriented projects would oversee the archival process. In the context of an increasingly conservative political climate in France, many thought that community-oriented archives would put them more in danger than established archival institutions should a neofascist government come to power. Although they also had the opportunity to select a more classical archival process, my participants chose to exercise their right to be forgotten (at least a little). In this talk, I stress that Oral Historians have many options to do justice to marginalized communities: we can archive their stories, we can share them with the widest audience possible, but we can also act as medieval chroniclers and be a curated imperfect window into the past. Though our instinct as historians is to preserve the “material” as close as possible to its original state, I draw on reflections from the field of Trans Studies (Baril 2018; Gill-Peterson 2022) and on my own experience as an Oral Historian of Trans experiences to defend the right of our participants to be forgotten, and the challenges for us to make peace with it.Oral history interviews as potential tools for self-actualisation and collective liberation In 2008 I interviewed my grandmother for the Montreal Life Stories project. The aim then was to preserve the firsthand account of someone who lived through